Small Towns and Their Hinterlands
India has always had an interesting history
of ancient riverine towns, and entropots on the trade route, at the cusp of
mountains and plains, and rivers and seas. The hinterland is the most
interesting of geographical phenomena, because ancient cities like Benaras,
Gauhati, Gorakhpur, Kochi, for example, would bring to attention not just the
co-existence of various religions, but also of occupations. One only has to
think of the phenomenal variety of production of crafts that many small towns
carry with them, to know that the idea of the
modern city or the metropolis is something which speaks demographically
of industrialisation, and artificially produced consumption patterns. Metropoli,
by their very nature, as the Mexican sociologist Manuel Castells showed, are
linked not only to cities of various population density, but also to small
towns and villages. It is the nature of communication networks that allow small
towns to be meshed with a larger more complex and voluminous maze of
populations, with their varied occupations and their social and cultural needs.
India’s villages are now being sought to be denuded by the intensity of massive
modernisation projects with the assumption that the greater volume of
electricity produced by damming rivers, will bring down local populations
through a Malthusian project, which will make villagers lives seem outdated and on the route to self extinction.
Industrialised agriculture, which the so
called Green, White and Mulberry
Revolutions propagate are based on the idea of mono agriculture. Punjab and
Gujarat are examples politically of what happens when industrialised
agriculture projects itself as the only
type of modernisation that is available to the Indian imagination. Tamil
Nadu has offered another way, which is agriculture as sustainable, as a means
of livelihood, and of cross border exchanges, leading to profound nutritionally
substantive indexes. It might be interesting to look at the way in which Tamil
farmers have foregrounded education too, since the time of Nadar freedom
fighters, such as Kamaraj, to premise professionalization as a goal, along with
the contexts of farming, engineering colleges,automobile manufacture and
industrialisation as co-existent occupational zones. The same tradition has
valorised weaving, metal and stone work
as ancient occupations which have a very important role to play. Spiritual
centres also attract tourists, as do dance and
music as forms of classical and
contemporary discipline. The dialogue between Kerala and Tamil Nadu on the question of dam renovation is probably the most interesting relic of a colonial history, and foregrounds how we think of Agriculture and Tourism in the two states. The Pallakad gap has now completely transformed from verdant hills to a long traffic lined route for trucks going between the two states carrying goods.
It is very important to set up the debates
on what the people want, by conducting studies which are not biased towards
industrialisation as the only way in which modern Indians see their role in a
buoyant economy. The average land holding is two and a half acres, perhaps, but
the constant success of traditional farmers in producing bumper crops, whether
in Nalanda in Bihar or in the former arid zones of Tamil Nadu, have to be
understood within its cultural and historical contexts. With the water crises
and climate change representing itself
continually through modes of adaptation by local farmers, it is necessary to
take the voice of activists into account. The North East which has withstood
varieties of colonialism, including interior colonialism, is now in a precarious
political condition with the appointment of an army chief known to have
disciplinary action being taken against him for vacuous, or even worse,
actively dastardly behaviour against local communities.
When we look at tribal or dalit
communities, we have to be aware of the way in which their world view is
attached to visions of the land as a potent and animistic force. When they are
forced to leave their homes, where they are able to lead frugal lives in
consonance with their beliefs, they are rendered destitute. This is why for
decades the Indian government (bureaucracy) has worked with alleviation of
poverty programmes rather than with the
sole idea that forced eviction is the only way that the poor can be
forced into the cities as cheap labour. Industrialised farming will create the
kind of destructive, separatist and entropic violence that India faced in the
1980s, and which continues to be seen in Maoist regions.
Where people are well fed, clothed, educated
and offered employment, the chances of survival of people and freedoms are the
highest. Alongside this, comes the awareness of citizen rights and privileges.
By constantly offering free electricity to urbanites in large cities, so that
their recreational and consumption enhanced lifestyles are protected, we are
doing tremendous damage to the environment and to local communities.
Small towns, which have a hinterland in
agriculture, also provide us the best window to tourism, which is one of the
most revenue generating occupations in the globalised world. This permits
people to have the autonomy to choose how and where they wish to live, rather
than competing unthinkingly with the
industrialised West, and which
also permits revisiting our pragmatic
orientations with regard to survival strategies.